KFC trying to get healthy????

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 17, 2009 3:27 AM GMT
    http://www.kfc.com/nutrition/grilled.asp
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 17, 2009 4:07 AM GMT
    Looks yummy.

    Something about that chart seems wrong though. What is "33" as a serving size? I'm wondering if the columns and rows are misaligned or something.

    4 grams of fat is good though. Wonder if it tastes as good as the fried stuff?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 17, 2009 4:18 AM GMT
    I think that is total grams per serving, judging by the protein and fat content. However, I'm not quite sure why they have varied serving sizes...

  • jhelling

    Posts: 168

    Apr 17, 2009 4:47 PM GMT
    Hmmm... Idk, but I would imagine that the serving sizes are one breast, one wing, etc. Does that make sense as the why a breast serving size is so much bigger?
  • CAtoFL

    Posts: 834

    Apr 17, 2009 4:51 PM GMT
    I went to K(un)FC and tried their grilled chicken. At my KFC, it was pretty dry and the breasts were noticeably smaller than competitors. We have El Pollo Loco out here and EPL's chicken breasts are about 50% bigger (no joke). The only advantage to KFC is that three chicken breasts were about $8.50 while at EPL, they're about $10.50.

    Anyway, although I applaud KFC for trying, I give their effort a B-/C+.

    Oh, and the taste was okay, but nothing like the fried original recipe.