It is this type of homosexual that represent the gay image in a bad distasteful way.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2009 12:50 AM GMT
    i just got off the phone with my close friend and he was like check out www.perezhilton.com site... i was like ok.. what did this mess report now. Mr Perez Hilton felt it necessary to report on the leaking of Oscar Winner Dustin Lance Black..who was the screen writer of MILK.....ok Apparently some sex pics of extreme sexuality was leaked.(hot) but stilll...obviously by some jealous hating individual. Now this person took it upon herself to post the xxxxxx pics on his website for millions to see. There you be a limit. Its like hes kicking the horse when its down. Mr Black did something for the gay community to bring to light the struggle of one man. Who knows these pics might have been taken long ago before MILK project was conceived but give the guy some respect and do not repost them so more people can see it. im sick of this fat fuck calling himself a active supporter for the gay cause when hes obviously taking part in destroying gay individuals that actually has accomplished something in the gay community.--- He might as well be a republican in the closet. i wont even paste a link to the pictures as doing so will only further spread it. Thank you perez..thank you for instilling the negative concept of what a gay mans life in the bedroom is like...and if you saw the pics you would understand.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2009 1:04 AM GMT

    Yeah, insight more hate, that'll stop the hate. Perez Hilton is a shocking personality, that's what he does, be shocking. If this other guy is the subdued part being represented, what of the shocking part? I've tried, I can't hate Perez Hilton because life is multi faceted and there is nothing that can be done about it. Even the shocking side has it's pros as well. Atleast looking at it this way will lower your blood pressure because hating it won't change anything. Picking what "parts" of gay society are pretty enough to represent it....you're just showing a facet of yourself that mirrors what you hate about Hilton. See, that side is a part of all of us.



  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2009 1:07 AM GMT
    I esteem him the way that I do Rush Limbaugh: by trying to ignore everything he says and does.

    icon_twisted.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2009 1:08 AM GMT
    Perez Hilton is a gossip columnist. It's really no different from the Enquirer or Star Magazine. I personally don't follow him, but I don't see think that he owes Dustin Lance Black better treatment than Jessica Simpson gets from other gossip sites.

    I don't have a problem with DLB having naughty pictures or video. He's a young, attractive guy having fun. My only issue with him is that he's barebacking in those pictures.

    But Perez (whom I have no love for) didn't buy these pictures or produce them (DLB did that himself), so I can't see what you're mad at him for?
  • imperator

    Posts: 626

    Jun 13, 2009 7:07 AM GMT
    Well, while I find it disrespectful and ignorant to publicize someone else's personal, private photos like that, at the same time maybe it kind of bears examining why a person's naked body is such a cause of disrepute? Isn't that more of an indictment against our culture, that people seeing our naked bodies-- hard dicks included-- is (or is expected to be) so shameful and damaging when it's not strictly controlled?

    I mean, on the one hand yes, I'd be embarrassed and a bit scandalized if someone posted naked pictures of me-- the dissemination of which I thought was under my control-- to some website for millions of strangers to see. But on the other hand, not being in that situation at the moment, I'm kind of embarrassed at myself to think I could be shamed so easily as by having my body exposed; we shouldn't be humiliated by our bodies icon_neutral.gif

    For all we know, Mr. Black couldn't care less-- he could even be an exhibitionist getting off on the attention-- and all this outrage at the 'indignity' done to him could just be everyone else colonially imposing their prudish attitudes on his naked and unashamed body. It just seems interesting that we go from point A (so-'n-so posted Mr. X's nude pics on the interwebs) to point B (so-'n-so is a terrible person and a bad example!) without really explicating what we find bad about it-- can we really take for granted that the presumed lack of consent is what offends, or could that actually be secondary to the presumed 'badness' of Mr. X's nudity on display at all?

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2009 7:18 AM GMT
    Perez Hilton seems like the type of person that would probably not be able to take his own medicine. He started making his living by being nasty, and now, he is a slave to it. He is giving what his audience wants to continue making a living. I'm not saying it is right, but it is just the way it is.

  • imperator

    Posts: 626

    Jun 13, 2009 7:30 AM GMT
    Buffyfan84 saidPerez Hilton seems like the type of person that would probably not be able to take his own medicine.[...]


    {snickers} Probably not, but then... I mean at risk of backpedaling on "we shouldn't be ashamed of our bodies," who would really want to look at naked pictures of him, even to post them?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2009 10:42 AM GMT
    I loved how he was talking shit about Victoria beckham and we she confronted him he couldn't say shit. Don't you just love people like that lol.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2009 11:00 AM GMT
    He might as well be a republican in the closet.

    Why denigrate Rebublicans? An obvious Democrat did this. Why point a finger at Republicans? Why do you have to say that this is a Closet Republican? Why not just admit Demos can be assholes as much as Republicans can be? It was a Demo, not a closet Republican, that posted this. Admit the truth. This was posted by a Demo.
  • silverfox

    Posts: 3178

    Jun 13, 2009 11:09 AM GMT
    Personally, I don't blame Perez Hilton, or Mr. Black for anything.

    I do think it is the person who distributed the tapes and pictures (wrong).

    Also, there would be no Perez Hilton if people didn't support him by reading him everyday. Period.

    I tend to look within on these kind of things....
    Now most everyone will say "Oh I NEVER read him...."
    Whatever.

    If you do, as I do from time to time, maybe you will be thinking what I am thinking when I click on his page from now on.....

    I am part of the problem.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 13, 2009 11:36 AM GMT
    Here is the link to Dustin Black's response to the pics being posted. Interesting that Perez Hilton sort of fusses at folks about being careful of making vidoes and taking pics of themselves having sex and them being posted, yet the pics have an "email this" function attached. pffft. Thanks to terryf for posting the link.
    http://www.advocate.com/news_detail_ektid90060.asp
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 14, 2009 2:14 PM GMT
    Sex tapes are sooo last decade. icon_lol.gif

    Seriously, why are they even controversial? Everyone has sex don't they?





























    ..don't they? icon_confused.gif