RealJock - Gay Fitness, Health, and Life

FORUMS > Gay News & Events Forum Rules

Sort by:

MJ isnt biological father of any of his kids....and didnt adopt them
Hidden member	Jul 01, 2009 12:57 AM GMT and his former wife Debbie wasnt the mother. Good lord! Where does it legally leave the kids? ... I thought the kids looked awfully white. ...

creature Posts: 305	Jul 01, 2009 1:04 AM GMT Oh lordy... Caslon, where did you hear this? And I've seen people who are mixed who look white or non-black when they're half black. And his kids do look multi-racial.
Hidden member	Jul 01, 2009 1:05 AM GMT It's a shame they aren't black or Asian, Madonna or Angelina welcome them with open arms.
Hidden member	Jul 01, 2009 1:28 AM GMT Timberoo saidIt's a shame they aren't black or Asian, Madonna or Angelina welcome them with open arms. or Bruno...
Hidden member	Jul 01, 2009 1:47 AM GMT creature saidOh lordy... Caslon, where did you hear this? And I've seen people who are mixed who look white or non-black when they're half black. And his kids do look multi-racial. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#31672548
creature Posts: 305	Jul 01, 2009 2:56 AM GMT I clicked on the link. And if you listen to the interview at the 01:44-02:07 interval, you will realize that it's all hearsay. Nothing substantive has been brought forward regarding those claims. I'll admit I'm wrong should evidence present itself. But right now, what you have is just speculation.
Hidden member	Jul 01, 2009 7:21 AM GMT Can't believe it without proof. Especially since the following has happened... http://www.realjock.com/gayforums/571338 Fox News given permission by courts to put out misinformation. Precedence has been set, so all US news sources are suspect.
GQjock Posts: 5714	Jul 01, 2009 10:35 AM GMT Just when you think it's weird enough
cupidshold Posts: 583	Jul 01, 2009 11:50 AM GMT I knew there was something odd about him having blond haired kids
Hidden member	Jul 01, 2009 11:56 AM GMT There's something to it. I heard on CNN that Debbie declared she wanted nothing to do with the children. I thought that was odd, even for someone so closely tied to Jacko, and the alleged mother of those kids. Speculation or not, it's official: those children are going to be haunted by this for the rest of their lives. It looks like Jacko's spirit will live on.
cupidshold Posts: 583	Jul 01, 2009 11:59 AM GMT Tapper saidThere's something to it. I heard on CNN that Debbie declared she wanted nothing to do with the children. I thought that was odd, even for someone so closely tied to Jacko, and the alleged mother of those kids. Speculation or not, it's official: those children are going to be haunted by this for the rest of their lives. It looks like Jacko's spirit will live on. Well I think auntie Janet should take them in
Hidden member	Jul 01, 2009 12:12 PM GMT CUPIDSCHOK3HOLD said Tapper saidThere's something to it. I heard on CNN that Debbie declared she wanted nothing to do with the children. I thought that was odd, even for someone so closely tied to Jacko, and the alleged mother of those kids. Speculation or not, it's official: those children are going to be haunted by this for the rest of their lives. It looks like Jacko's spirit will live on. Well I think auntie Janet should take them in Without knowing a thing about that family, I'd have to agree. She seems to be the most normal out of all of them.
Hidden member	Jul 01, 2009 12:20 PM GMT Tapper saidWithout knowing a thing about that family, I'd have to agree. She seems to be the most normal out of all of them. Yeah, she just has her tit pop out on national television during the Super Bowl! LOL! OK, OK, cheap shot perhaps. And actually I personally like Janet Jackson, have always enjoyed her videos that are played in clubs. Whether she's mother material for these stranded kids is another matter. I've also read these reports that question their legal status now, just have to see how it develops. If Jackson named them in his will then I would hope they get a share, no matter who they are. Their care & custody then becomes the issue.
Ducky45 Posts: 2554	Jul 01, 2009 1:34 PM GMT Until a DNA test proves that neither are his children by birth then I will believe it. Even if they aren't his by birth they are still his kids he raised them. Why does it even matter? They are his children they are named in his will as his children. As far as Ms. Rowe making the decision not to be a part of their lives, that was her decision. They made a business deal.
Hidden member	Jul 01, 2009 7:48 PM GMT Ducky45 saidEven if they aren't his by birth they are still his kids he raised them. Why does it even matter? They are his children they are named in his will as his children. Exactly.
Hidden member	Jul 01, 2009 7:55 PM GMT Yeah I was wondering how he had white, blonde haired, blue-eyed kids. Seemed like a genetic impossibility.
Hidden member	Jul 02, 2009 1:16 AM GMT Ugh, some of you really need to go to Jamaica where you will see racial mixes that would apparently surprise some of you... A third cousin of mine has brownish-blond hair and white appearing skin.....blue eyes. She married a white Canadian. Brown baby. The ONLY way to tell with MJs kids by DNA testing. Poor little kids, held up for the world to scrutinize and make snide specs about.
Rujock Posts: 193	Jul 02, 2009 1:21 AM GMT I never believed that they were really his kids in the first place
Hidden member	Jul 02, 2009 1:45 AM GMT From a CBC News story "Michael Jackson's will, written seven years ago, gives his 79-year-old mother, Katherine Jackson, custody of his children and leaves his money in a trust, cutting out the star singer's former wife, Debbie Rowe." He has a huge family, but the person left to care for his 3 young children is his 79 year old mother?
Hidden member	Jul 02, 2009 1:57 AM GMT Yesterday on CNN, a reporter indicated that there is strong evidence that MJ is the biological father. Truth be told, though, I don't need to know this, and I wish the media would resume reporting on the actual news.
pedroc954 Posts: 331	Jul 02, 2009 1:58 AM GMT Duh.....the suprising thing is why no one questioned this before.
Hidden member	Jul 02, 2009 1:59 AM GMT why is this surprising? none of the kids look the least bit like him.
Hidden member	Jul 02, 2009 2:00 AM GMT creature saidOh lordy... Caslon, where did you hear this? And I've seen people who are mixed who look white or non-black when they're half black. And his kids do look multi-racial. his kids don't look multi-racial to me
Hidden member	Jul 02, 2009 11:22 AM GMT UofTLatinBoy saidFrom a CBC News story "Michael Jackson's will, written seven years ago, gives his 79-year-old mother, Katherine Jackson, custody of his children and leaves his money in a trust, cutting out the star singer's former wife, Debbie Rowe." He has a huge family, but the person left to care for his 3 young children is his 79 year old mother? Yeah, he's always seemed like such a level headed, practical guy. What was he thinking?
_chuck_ Posts: 405	Jul 02, 2009 1:11 PM GMT Timberoo said Yeah, he's always seemed like such a level headed, practical guy. What was he thinking? THIS Is this why we care? The MJ circus stopped being interesting decades ago.
GwgTrunks Posts: 957	Jul 02, 2009 1:51 PM GMT someguy saidYeah I was wondering how he had white, blonde haired, blue-eyed kids. Seemed like a genetic impossibility. My neice is a black/white mix. She's got my grandma's pale complexion and gorgeous dark red hair, but her facial features clearly come from her father. As far as MJ's kids go... I think they should be with their grandmother.
Hidden member	Jul 02, 2009 4:01 PM GMT My only nephew has both filipino parents. But his hair is light brown as well as his eyes and he's very light skinned he's been mistaken for being half-american. Oh and I had a grandfather with blue eyes. MJ has always looked mixed race to me anyway (at least before his plastic surgeries), so it could be simply just further dilution of the genes. That said, let it rest. Who cares if he's the father or not.
Hidden member	Jul 02, 2009 4:22 PM GMT Sedative saidThat said, let it rest. Who cares if he's the father or not. I agree. As I wrote above, if he made those kids his heirs, they are his heirs, even if he found them under a cabbage patch leaf (old explanation once told to little children of where babies come from). As for mixed-race appearance, I really don't know how reliable that is, nor do I care. And frankly, I foresee a day when racial differences will largely disappear on the Earth, anyway, as humans blend all races together. Unless, of course, genetic engineering becomes a major factor in the future, a Brave New World where all bets are off. Some of you here may live long enough to know the answer to that.
Sean85 Posts: 1951	Jul 02, 2009 4:25 PM GMT andrewps said Timberoo saidIt's a shame they aren't black or Asian, Madonna or Angelina welcome them with open arms. or Bruno... Hahaha.. Which I will be seeing many many times
Ducky45 Posts: 2554	Jul 02, 2009 4:26 PM GMT It just shows that lack of progress that we have made as Americans. 300 years later race is still an issue...excuse me while I go VOMIT!

GQjock Posts: 5714	Jul 03, 2009 11:56 PM GMT 'scuse me But if these aren't his kids and he didn't adopt them Then What The Hell are they doing there? They were then basically guests in his house I think this makes this whole situation ridiculous .... Then who the hell did these kids come from and where did they come from?