"Top 10 Reasons Why The BMI Is Bogus"

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 06, 2009 6:01 PM GMT
    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=106268439

    I hope more people start realizing this...
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 06, 2009 6:55 PM GMT
    So, the author is saying that we don't have an obesity problem in this country? Never mind that rates of heart disease, diabetes, and other weight related problems are increasing. The 25% of the country that is obese contains a statistically significant number of athletes?
  • Fritter

    Posts: 1696

    Jul 06, 2009 7:44 PM GMT
    I agree that BMI needs a third dimention, i.e. waist size. Height, weight, and "width" would give a better picture of obesity
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 06, 2009 8:00 PM GMT
    The BMI has its flaws, but still is the standard that medical researchers and some practicing physicians use. This may change shortly. There is a better and simpler way to predict the risk for cardiovascular disease than the BMI. Simply use the waist circumference.

    1. BMI is falsely elevated in muscular individuals. BMI is falsely lowered in individuals with little muscle mass.
    2.Bone structure can influence BMI. Larger framed individuals tend to have a higher BMI. The above finding helps explain why Asian-Americans, who tend to have smaller bone frames, have a higher disease risk at a lower BMI than people from other ethnic backgrounds.
    3.The risk for vascular disease correlates better with fat in the abdominal area and not fat located distally in the arms and legs. The BMI does not take into consideration how bodyfat is distributed..

    Not all insurance companies use BMI. I was once a medical underwriter for an insurance company and we never used the BMI.

    There certainly is an obesity problem in the USA. You just need to observe people.

    The following two studies were mentioned in a Medscape article discussing BMI versus waist circumference.

    INTERHEART was the first large, international study to establish that obesity is a cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor that is statistically significant in basically all of the world's populations. Subsequent prespecified analyses of the INTERHEART results have further determined that a simple measure of waist-to-hip ratio is a more powerful predictor of obesity-associated CVD risk level than any other single measure of obesity (eg, body mass index [BMI]) or constellation of measures (eg, metabolic syndrome).

    Now, a second large trial, the International Day for the Evaluation of Abdominal Obesity (IDEA) study, has also shown that waist circumference is a stronger predictor of CVD outcomes than BMI. First results of this large international study in over 170,000 people indicate that waist circumference is associated with CVD, independently of the relationship that BMI has with CVD risk, and regardless of age or geography

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 06, 2009 8:24 PM GMT
    I completely agree since I am 6ft tall and weigh about 185lbs and have a 32inch waist and im listed as OBESE.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 06, 2009 8:49 PM GMT
    VUandC88 saidI completely agree since I am 6ft tall and weigh about 185lbs and have a 32inch waist and im listed as OBESE.


    I must be even obeser: I´m 5 9, 31-32 inch waist (fluctuates) and weigh 183lb today. Look at my pics. Do I look obese?

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 06, 2009 8:59 PM GMT
    I wuv U 2, much moor.

    icon_rolleyes.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 06, 2009 10:13 PM GMT
    wuv ewe soooo much, much moar.

    You, un morón? No....

    icon_cool.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jul 06, 2009 10:18 PM GMT
    BMI is crap.