TATTOOS on WOMEN, YUCK!

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 13, 2009 8:58 PM GMT
    I just decided I don't like them. I don't like the cute hearts, or the shoulder thing, or the tramp stamp.

    Tattoos are for men, warriors, grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.

    OK, don't hate me for saying so. I just think men carry them better.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 13, 2009 11:06 PM GMT
    I don't know, I've seen woman who look pretty good with their tats. Have you not seen Angelina Jolie?!?!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 13, 2009 11:59 PM GMT
    You might just have a few mysogynistic tendencies, you know.
  • HndsmKansan

    Posts: 16311

    Aug 14, 2009 3:01 AM GMT
    Well lots of tats don't do anything for me, on a man or woman.... I don't think women should be singled out.. if its good enough for a man, why not
    a woman (unlike Secret anti perspirent) LOL
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 14, 2009 5:18 AM GMT
    Tattoos are disgusting in general.

    You say they're for warriors.... but how many warriors have you seen in the 21st century?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 14, 2009 5:20 AM GMT
    world5524 saidI don't know, I've seen woman who look pretty good with their tats. Have you not seen Angelina Jolie?!?!


    classis bad example. her tats look like they were done by a three year old
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 14, 2009 5:29 AM GMT
    it depends on what it is and where it is i've seen some really beautiful tattoos on women.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 14, 2009 5:31 AM GMT
    I think this thread should be renamed:

    "WOMEN, YUCK"
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 14, 2009 5:32 AM GMT
    Homolicious saidTattoos are disgusting in general.

    You say they're for warriors.... but how many warriors have you seen in the 21st century?


    there are a lot man. guys and girls in the military and well people who are into the sport of mma its very warrior culture driven also a lifestyle and some of these guys in the sport were in the military too they're all modern day warriors.
  • JayneCobb

    Posts: 709

    Aug 14, 2009 5:34 AM GMT
    Homolicious saidTattoos are disgusting in general.

    You say they're for warriors.... but how many warriors have you seen in the 21st century?


    They're called soldiers dick.
  • arielanatole

    Posts: 77

    Aug 14, 2009 6:08 AM GMT
    You are sexist. Pathetic. Here's hoping you get some much needed education.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 14, 2009 10:36 AM GMT
    Homolicious saidTattoos are disgusting in general.

    You say they're for warriors.... but how many warriors have you seen in the 21st century?


    i guess you've never been to a barney's semi-annual sale in nyc...
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 14, 2009 10:37 AM GMT
    tats on anyone - disgusting, evil, move away from me!!!!!!!!!! icon_evil.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 14, 2009 11:10 AM GMT
    The thing with tatoos is that they're a fashion accessory and fashions change.

    You don't wear today clothes from the 80s, so why would you want a tattoo you selected at the age of 18 to still be on your arm when you're 50?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 14, 2009 12:54 PM GMT
    Warriors! HAHAHAHAHA!
    Give
    me
    a
    break

    thithith.jpg
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 14, 2009 7:33 PM GMT
    SeaSon saidThe thing with tatoos is that they're a fashion accessory and fashions changed.

    You don't wear today clothes from the 80s, so why would you want a tattoo you selected at the age of 18 to still be on your arm when you're 50?


    Tattoos for some are personal expressions of their beliefs or personality... they're not fashion accessories.

    I thought about my tattoos for a long time (well over a year on all of them) before I had them done, so yes I will still want them on me when I am 50... that is why I had the TATTOOED (hence the permanence).

    People that dismiss others' forms of expression so freely and without thought, I find extremely tacky. Think before you speak (or as it were type).

    By-the-way, you misspelled tattoo. Just FYI.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 14, 2009 8:01 PM GMT
    Ganymede0 said
    SeaSon saidThe thing with tatoos is that they're a fashion accessory and fashions changed.

    You don't wear today clothes from the 80s, so why would you want a tattoo you selected at the age of 18 to still be on your arm when you're 50?


    Tattoos for some are personal expressions of their beliefs or personality... they're not fashion accessories.

    I thought about my tattoos for a long time (well over a year on all of them) before I had them done, so yes I will still want them on me when I am 50... that is why I had the TATTOOED (hence the permanence).

    People that dismiss others' forms of expression so freely and without thought, I find extremely tacky. Think before you speak (or as it were type).

    By-the-way, you misspelled tattoo. Just FYI.


    Thanks for the typo correction. I wasn't trying to dismiss anyone's form of expression, just suggesting that a less permanent form might be better, in case you change your mind.

    Scientists keep improving tattoo removal techniques, so hopefully this will be less of an issue in the future. At the moment, the removal process is still very painful and doesn't remove tattoos 100%.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 16, 2009 4:02 PM GMT
    chungo44 said
    world5524 saidI don't know, I've seen woman who look pretty good with their tats. Have you not seen Angelina Jolie?!?!


    classis bad example. her tats look like they were done by a three year old


    I agree, her tats look like shit, but she looks HOT with them on.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 16, 2009 7:27 PM GMT
    Homolicious saidTattoos are disgusting in general.

    You say they're for warriors.... but how many warriors have you seen in the 21st century?


    Go tell that to the Maori people in New Zealand, or some of the traditional Samoans. Hell, even our own Native Americans often show a great deal of warrior spirit. And tattoos are not always disgusting. Some are quite beautiful, and in the case of the Hawaiians, Maori, and Polynesians, deeply indicative of family, tribal, and cultural history.

    Try educating yourself before dissing others' lifeways.
  • Rookz

    Posts: 947

    Aug 16, 2009 7:53 PM GMT
    Why does it matter to you if a person does something for themselves such as body modification?

    One, it's their own business and they are just as happy leaving you alone to do whatever you do.

    Two, as people who are judge continuously by others, we shouldn't judge in return.

    You know what they say about judgmental? People judge cause their mental.