American David Duke - A proof that Darwinism and Racism are linked

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 28, 2009 8:08 PM GMT
    http://creation.com/darwinisms-influence-on-modern-racists-and-white-supremacist-groups-the-case-of-david-duke

    Copy this link and read the article.
    It shows that the evil lie of Darwinism is the foundation of Racism, the idea that black people are inferior to white people due to evolution.
    A doctrine beloved by both the Nazi and the Klu Klax Klan.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 28, 2009 8:10 PM GMT
    http://creation.com/darwinisms-influence-on-modern-racists-and-white-supremacist-groups-the-case-of-david-duke

    Easier for those who might wish to read the article.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 28, 2009 8:19 PM GMT
    Hitler also used Christianity to support his treatment of the Jews.

    "Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord."
    - Adolf Hitler, from Mein Kampf

    http://lava.net/~hcssc/Hitler.html

    To match your style wording:

    It shows the evil lie of Chiristianity is the foundation of Hilter's beliefs: The Idea that Jews deserved to be punished.

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 28, 2009 8:22 PM GMT
    This really is intellectual crap. "Darwinism" and evolutionists are not synonymous with racism. That some racists use the theory of evolution to promote racism is the fault of the racists who pervert science, not the science itself. I might note that other racists use Creationism as drawn from the Bible to support the superiority of Whites. When you're a racist you'll distort whatever is convenient to support your bigotry.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 28, 2009 8:31 PM GMT
    The Bible/Christianity has often been used to justify things like racism and salvery. For example, the "Mark of Cain" was used to justify salvery.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 28, 2009 8:58 PM GMT
    phemt saidHitler also used Christianity to support his treatment of the Jews.

    "Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord."
    - Adolf Hitler, from Mein Kampf

    http://lava.net/~hcssc/Hitler.html

    To match your style wording:

    It shows the evil lie of Chiristianity is the foundation of Hilter's beliefs: The Idea that Jews deserved to be punished.



    Adolf Hitler was NOT a Christian.

    He was a Roman Catholic.

    BTW Thanks for setting up the direct link to the article, I wish I could do it, by I have always failed in this.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 28, 2009 9:00 PM GMT
    Catholics are Christians. Oh my! you are really one of those far out fundamentalist.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 28, 2009 9:01 PM GMT
    direct link by left clicking on the text and then clicking on URL

    thus
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 28, 2009 9:12 PM GMT


    lol NotThatOld, Roman Catholics certainly are a christian organization. One of the oldest.

    Darwinism has zip to do with racism.

    Show us proof that different races are different stages of an evolution that determines some are 'inferior', because we could easily use the argument against white people as the ozone layer deteriorates and people of colour don't get the skin cancer killing whites.

    Argh, the suggestion Darwinism is evil is so ignorant we can't understand how you fell for it.

    The bible was written by people who thought the Earth was flat and would happily kill or exile any that said otherwise.

    You know, we can't post any more on this topic because you have too much to learn.


    This is just Doug now. I'd like to remind you again of the absolute evil that comes from taking that book literally in all aspects. You will injure yourself and those you love by doing this.


  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 28, 2009 9:18 PM GMT
    meninlove said

    ...

    You know, we can't post any more on this topic because you have too much to learn.
    ...


    I agree with you on that one icon_wink.gif

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 28, 2009 9:35 PM GMT
    I'm not going to pretend I read that

    Darwinism says that White people are more naturally capable to survive the European environment in which they evolved and Black people are more evolved to survive the environment and conditions in the Caribbean and Africa.

    Neither is inferior, and any claims of such are simply racist and xenophobic people twisting such scientific facts for there own purposes

    and now in the 21st century your doing the same, twisting peoples twisted interpretations to prove something your afraid to admit is absurdity

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 28, 2009 10:12 PM GMT
    jprichva said
    NotThatOld said Adolf Hitler was NOT a Christian.
    He was a Roman Catholic.

    Oh, so Roman Catholics don't believe in Christ?
    Someone better tell the Pope.

    PSSST... and don't tell the OP that his thread title still reads "David Dude" and that he can edit it. icon_rolleyes.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 28, 2009 10:41 PM GMT
    Here I brought up the issue of David Dude, sorry - Duke. I have not heard of him before I read the cited article. Apparantly he was a senator for the State of Louisiana, where in the 18th and 19th centuries, was one of the chief states for negro slavery, with New Orleans as a major trade city.
    For those who have not read the article (it is quite a long one) it is Dude who justifies his prejudice against blacks by means of Darwinism. Like Adolf Hitler with Germany, he too seem to wish for a white supremacist America.
    **********************************************
    There are major differences between Roman Catholicism and Protestant Christianity. The former believe in the transub, the "miracle" that turns the wafer offered at Eucharist into the literal body and blood of Christ. Protestants simply says that the Eucharist symbolises the body and blood, and it is not meant to be literal. The Catholic Church has a history of executing many just for this difference in this opinion alone.
    Other differences includes Rome's mediatrix, the Virgin Mary who assist Christ in interceding for our sins, salvation by works in opposition to faith in Christ alone, the Confession to a priest, Purgatory, the Sacraments, the pope as Peter's successor and the clegy/laity class divide, all opposed by Protestants.
    **********************************************
    Martin Luther was perhaps the greatest Reformer in the history of the Church. But his biggest weakness was his hatred of the Jew. Lutherian churches in Germany sided with Rome in backing Hitler against the Jews.
    On the contary, the Bible teaches that the Abrahamic covenant God made with the sons of Israel is everlasting, and no Christian has any right whatsoever to look down upon, let alone condemn, the Jews.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 28, 2009 10:43 PM GMT
    NotThatOld,


    It's DUKE not DUDE!!!!!!!!!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 28, 2009 11:40 PM GMT
    Doug,
    Yes, your'e right. It is Duke, not Dude!
    But he is such a dude, that rather than edit the OP title, well let's say that I have renamed him.
    Arise, Sir David Dude!!!!

    Edits post:

    The error is now corrected.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 29, 2009 2:11 AM GMT
    Catholics are Christian in the sense that they, like Protestants, believe in the salvation of Christ. They may have a different take on certain issues, but that does not take away from them being Christian. Also, mind you Protestants also contributed to burning heretics: John Calvin supported the burning of "heretic" Michael Servetus; Puritans burnt Witches. I can't believe I am defending Catholics. I have to admit though Catholics are not half as bad compared to certain conversative Fundamentalist Protestants.
  • kew1

    Posts: 1595

    Aug 29, 2009 7:34 AM GMT
    "It shows that the evil lie of Darwinism is the foundation of Racism, the idea that black people are inferior to white people due to evolution."

    Interesting conclusion - Darwin's Origin of the Species - 1859
    Slavery abolished throughout the British Empire over 20 years before.

    So what caused Europeans to enslave Africans before he published (rhetorical question)& shouldn't we have re-introduced it after he published according to that conclusion?





    & why did pressing the quote button take me back to the home page even though I was logged in?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 29, 2009 7:48 AM GMT
    NotThatOld wrote: "Here I brought up the issue of David Dude. I have not heard of him before I read the cited article. Apparantly he was a senator for the State of Louisiana, where in the 18th and 19th centuries, was one of the chief states for negro slavery, with New Orleans as a major trade city."

    (I hope RealJock soon fixes the quote function. Every time I try to use it, clicking on it takes me to the home page. It seems that others are having the same problem.)

    In case anyone is confused, David Duke was never in the United States Senate.

    From the ADL website page on Duke: "Political campaigns: In 1989, Duke won a seat representing Metairie, Louisiana, in the Louisiana State Legislature. Five unsuccessful political campaigns followed: a 1990 bid for the U.S. Senate, a 1991 campaign for the governorship of Louisiana, a bid for the Presidency in 1992, a Senatorial race in 1996, and a 1998 attempt to win a Congressional seat in Louisiana. In both the 1990 and 1991 races, he attracted a majority of Louisiana's white voters."

    Link to the ADL page:

    http://www.adl.org/learn/ext_us/david_duke/default.asp
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 29, 2009 8:19 AM GMT
    Just because one racist "believes" in evolutionary theory, doesn't make the theory wrong or evil.

    The problem with this guy is that he's not using the science correctly. Science is about building up a body of evidentiary support for a particular theory always with the thought that it may be proven wrong. A good scientist actually TRIES to prove their own theories wrong.

    There is plenty of evidence supporting evolution and plenty of evidence supporting certain genetic differences between races (such as skin color). However, there is no evidence that mental or emotional functioning differs between the races, and if you consider these the most fundamental parts of being human, there can be no scientific value judgement made about the different races. However, this guy is making value judgements based on race up front, then trying to make evolutionary theory support it.

    By doing this, he is wielding evolutionary theory as an alternative religion instead of a science. The key difference between science and religion is that religion is supposed to be taken on faith, and evidentiary support is unnecessary and often in opposition to the purpose of faith. Just like those who attempt to prove the bible true through evidence, he is groping around for a few disjointed facts which individually may seem to support his claim while completely ignoring the massive amount of evidence to the contrary. This man is not a true scientist, and does not correctly grasp the truth of evolutionary theory.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 29, 2009 10:57 AM GMT
    David Duke is a nut.

    Each race has certain adaptions to thrive in their native environment.

    In the case of enslaved folks, they were selectively bred, as well.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 29, 2009 11:06 AM GMT
    Dear NotThatOld,

    your logic and reasoning lacks just that, logic and reason. what you claim is insane icon_rolleyes.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 29, 2009 11:17 AM GMT
    Notthatold - have courage. Nobody here is accusing you of having evolved.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 29, 2009 11:50 AM GMT
    fucktard Pictures, Images and Photos
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 29, 2009 12:02 PM GMT
    There is only one way, and thats the Ori way. Unless you all accept this by 2012, you will all be damned, and your souls sent to damnation.

    Accept the Ori way, it is the only way.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Aug 29, 2009 2:31 PM GMT
    Oh. Forfucksakes. This is really getting fucking insane. Don't you see the irony that you are the same person who believes in a GOD THAT ENDORSES AND ENCOURAGES SLAVERY? And one who believes in the racial superiority of jews nonetheless.

    Or did you just forget that for hundreds of years, people used the Bible as justification for slavery?

    Did you even read the last sentence of the Article you linked?!

    "He has now dedicated his life to this goal, in spite of the fact that the racist Darwinian arguments Duke relies on have all been carefully refuted (and shown to be harmful) by both creationists and evolutionists."


    Darwin was NOT a fucking racist. He was even almost thrown overboard the HMS Beagle because of the way he disapproved of the Captain FitzRoy's overt racism.

    He also described an incident where a black woman jumped of a cliff to her death to escape slavery an remarked that it was prejudice that prevented people then from recognizing the true heroism of her sacrifice. If she wasn't black, people would have probably lauded her brave suicide.

    In fact, at the time of Darwin, most of the people classified the different races of men as separate species. A view Darwin opposed strongly.

    True, Darwin was at times eurocentrist, he wanted to educate other civilizations. But he never referred to race, he referred to populations, civilizations. Whether they be white, black, asian, or whathaveyou, because he believed that the european civilization was the most enlightened at the time (which is perhaps true, and has since come true, as the whole world becomes slowly westernized).

    If an ignorant idiot uses legitimate science as an excuse for his fanatical views it shows how much of an idiot he is and does not reflect in any way on the science he has somehow warped into his own version of psuedoscientific insanity.

    Now go read The Curse of Ham and let me hear you scream the same insane accusation about racism and religion. Because then it would be oh-so-true.