tryandbuy saidThey have to thrust harder to achieve sensation to stimulate their cocks. Uncut guys have so many more stimulatory senses--the pull of the foreskin, the pull of the frenulum, the sliding of the foreskin over the glans, all these variety of sensations--whereas the cut guy has basically only the friction of the anus or vagina against the head of the penis. Not to mention the head is keratinized (roughened) on the cut cock.
Just a theory I heard and decided to bring here. There's nothing wrong with being cut (I am) or having rough sex (I love it).
The majority of guys on here are American, which means the majority of guys on here are cut.
Americans have been brainwashed into thinking that a cut cock provides the same amount of pleasure as an uncut cock.
As you correctly stated, a cut cock is missing various parts that provide pleasure. If a guy is cut, he needs to stimulate his cock far more than an uncut guy does.
Everything you mentioned above is true, but Americans will deny it to their last, dying breath. It's just too big a blow to the ego for Americans to admit that they are sexually handicapped.
So instead, they'll say, "My cock is very sensitive," and "I've never had any problems," and "I enjoy the sensations that my cock gives me," and "Ask any guy who was uncut who got cut if he enjoys sex less and he will say it's as good as or better."
The last point always makes me smile. Of course it will be "as good as or better" because you aren't asking him 30 to 40 years after he got cut by which time the head of his cock has lost most of it's sensitivity due to keratinization.
Of course a cut cock will still give you sensations - they didn't cut ALL of it off. But the point that eludes American men (and I'm speaking mostly of white, black and other non-latino Americans) is that the sensations they are experiencing are a mere fraction of what uncut guys experience.
And just because there hasn't been a study to back this up doesn't mean that it isn't true.