Could the rough sex of Americans have to do with so many of them being circumcised?

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 06, 2009 1:24 AM GMT
    They have to thrust harder to achieve sensation to stimulate their cocks. Uncut guys have so many more stimulatory senses--the pull of the foreskin, the pull of the frenulum, the sliding of the foreskin over the glans, all these variety of sensations--whereas the cut guy has basically only the friction of the anus or vagina against the head of the penis. Not to mention the head is keratinized (roughened) on the cut cock.

    Just a theory I heard and decided to bring here. There's nothing wrong with being cut (I am) or having rough sex (I love it).
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 06, 2009 1:32 AM GMT
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17419812

    The ArticleCONCLUSION: These results do not support the hypothesized penile sensory differences associated with circumcision. However, group differences in penile temperature and sexual response were found.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 06, 2009 1:37 AM GMT

    No, it's American media. A man can't beat a man with a baseball bat like the Roc or slaughter younglings like a mad Jedi, but he can pound your hole in bed. No ones watching so he could relax, but in his mind the world is watching. However, this isn't true of all men. I know I don't take out my masculinity issues on my bed mates. Those who do have been kicked in the head by a fleeing bottom once or twice in their life, that's for sure

    .





  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 06, 2009 1:58 AM GMT
    great.

    do I have to get all possessive now, honey bear?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 06, 2009 2:20 AM GMT
    The rough sex of Americans? Honey, have you seen German porn?

    As Funk indicated, the medical literature does not support anything you say. I suspect you took a trip NORM.org where scientific literacy if not allowed.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 06, 2009 2:21 AM GMT

    Maintain me, keep me well oiled and I'll never stray...master.

    Photobucket

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 06, 2009 2:25 AM GMT
    Ummmmmmm...As far as I can tell Americans wheather they are circumsized or not don't have a monopoly on rough sex.

    Buy a plane ticket and go see for yourself.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 06, 2009 3:17 AM GMT
    I don't know if it is just Americans, but I sure love the feeling of a juicy ass slapping on my hips.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 06, 2009 3:18 AM GMT
    I'm also thinking that this is probably in the wrong section.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 06, 2009 3:58 AM GMT

    It's about role playing, not foreskin. icon_wink.gif

    and lol, brandosaurus, your two posts one after another cracked us up! Too funny!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 06, 2009 12:41 PM GMT
    Tryandbuy........ I'm not buying it!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 06, 2009 10:18 PM GMT
    Rough sex? Oh puhleeeeeez, being cut has nothing ot do with it.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 06, 2009 10:21 PM GMT
    Do you have directions, because I think I've been missing that.

    Try Berlin, they use cattle prods for foreplay.
  • Anto

    Posts: 2035

    Oct 06, 2009 11:18 PM GMT
    Funkapottomous saidhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17419812

    The ArticleCONCLUSION: These results do not support the hypothesized penile sensory differences associated with circumcision. However, group differences in penile temperature and sexual response were found.


    There are some pretty obvious problems with that study. Notice they excluded the foreskin (amongst other factors)?

    Another study from the same site as above:
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847
    ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedCONCLUSIONS: The glans of the circumcised penis is less sensitive to fine touch than the glans of the uncircumcised penis. The transitional region from the external to the internal prepuce is the most sensitive region of the uncircumcised penis and more sensitive than the most sensitive region of the circumcised penis. Circumcision ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis.


    http://www.livescience.com/health/070615_penis_sensitivity.html

    Livescience.comNow researchers prodding dozens of male penises with a fine-tipped tool have found that the five areas most receptive to fine-touch are routinely removed by the surgery.

    The finding, announced today, was detailed in the April issue of the British Journal of Urology (BJU) International.
    ...
    Morris Sorrells of National Organization of Circumcision Information Resources Center and colleagues created a “penile sensitivity map” by measuring the sensitivity of 19 locations on the penises of 159 male volunteers. Of the participants, 91 were circumcised as infants and none had histories of penile or sexual dysfunction.

    For circumcised penises, the most sensitive region was the circumcision scar on the underside of the penis, the researchers found. For uncircumcised penises, the areas most receptive to pressure were five regions normally removed during circumcision—all of which were more sensitive than the most sensitive part of the circumcised penis.
  • cowboyathlete

    Posts: 1346

    Oct 06, 2009 11:32 PM GMT
    tryandbuy saidThey have to thrust harder to achieve sensation to stimulate their cocks. Uncut guys have so many more stimulatory senses--the pull of the foreskin, the pull of the frenulum, the sliding of the foreskin over the glans, all these variety of sensations--whereas the cut guy has basically only the friction of the anus or vagina against the head of the penis. Not to mention the head is keratinized (roughened) on the cut cock.

    Just a theory I heard and decided to bring here. There's nothing wrong with being cut (I am) or having rough sex (I love it).
    Actually, it has to do with the fact that we call the game soccer, but everyone else calls it football. Any other stupid generalizations folks care to share?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 07, 2009 2:06 AM GMT
    MunchingZombie saidThe rough sex of Americans? Honey, have you seen German porn?

    *giggles* I have, I have!!!

    I've had a german too and DAMN if you wanna sit down for a week hehehe icon_redface.gif

    I'm uncircumcised but like it rough although not for the reasons that GG has encountered icon_eek.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 07, 2009 3:22 AM GMT
    I am circumsized and my dick is sensitive.. it rubs on my leg and it gets hard... its always hard... so I dont know .... I do have to use lotion to jerk off though.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 07, 2009 3:41 AM GMT
    I've never seen a posting or comment from an adult who was uncut, who got cut, who regreted it or said the sex was ruined. Has anyone heard a complaint?


  • Anto

    Posts: 2035

    Oct 09, 2009 2:06 AM GMT
    OHhiker saidI've never seen a posting or comment from an adult who was uncut, who got cut, who regreted it or said the sex was ruined. Has anyone heard a complaint?


    I don't think anyone is saying that sex is ruined. The biggest argument is just circumcising people against their will like as a child and anti-foreskin people lambasting all guys with foreskin as being diseased or unhygienic - this coming from men who lick the anus of other men, or put their finger there, or their penis, which I find ironic about it all! It's completely unbalanced thinking!
  • leixguy

    Posts: 144

    Oct 18, 2009 11:40 PM GMT
    i read an article in the daily telegraph (it was forworded to me im not a telegraph reader) about a survey done where 1000 'well travelled' women were asked which nationalities were best and worst in bed, and they found that americans are too rough so maybe it is true- by the men spanish guys are besticon_razz.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 19, 2009 12:21 AM GMT
    leixguy saidi read an article in the daily telegraph (it was forworded to me im not a telegraph reader) about a survey done where 1000 'well travelled' women were asked which nationalities were best and worst in bed, and they found that americans are too rough so maybe it is true- by the men spanish guys are besticon_razz.gif


    My latino friends would say that brown does it better.
  • leixguy

    Posts: 144

    Oct 19, 2009 1:01 AM GMT
    brazilians came second, tho the irish didnt fare to bad either coming 5th - god only knows why?!
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 19, 2009 1:23 AM GMT
    leixguy saidi read an article in the daily telegraph (it was forworded to me im not a telegraph reader) about a survey done where 1000 'well travelled' women were asked which nationalities were best and worst in bed, and they found that americans are too rough so maybe it is true- by the men spanish guys are besticon_razz.gif


    Well! If the women don't want the rough americans, let me have them icon_razz.gif
  • Little_Spoon

    Posts: 1562

    Oct 19, 2009 4:53 PM GMT
    I don't mind a guy being rough.

    I tend to lean towards the cut cock a little more anyways...
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Oct 19, 2009 5:02 PM GMT
    southbeach1500 saidAnd just because there hasn't been a study to back this up doesn't mean that it isn't true.


    You must have known I was going to swoop in here, didn't you?

    It is good for you to admit though that you can't back up your claims with research.

    Carry on.