bareback porn is bad?

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 18, 2010 10:38 PM GMT
    so im surprised at the gay community being up in arms regarding bareback gay porn and here are some things i dont understand....

    1. straight porn has basically been condom-less yet is not considered "BAREBACK". i subscribe to the following sites and none STATE that they are condom free...
    OyeLoca, Bang Bros Network, Brazil Bang, Anal in the Amazon

    2. gay bareback porn does not make people have bareback sex. if it did, then straight porn will make you have straight sex no? the whole monkey see monkey do mentality is beyond moronic. i mean, i see guys getting FISTED and DP'd but i have no desire to do it from watching porn.

    3. since you can't actually FEEL the porn, why would it really push you towards having condom free sex?

    4.since gay porn doesn't make performers use dental dams or condoms for oral sex and rimming, what difference does it make during sex? what about performers who take loads in the mouth and swallow?

    5. HIV is a problem and so is AIDS. I agree that far too many are being infected and it does change lives. that being said, i dont see how porn is to blame. almost all encounters that lead to condom free sex usually have more to do with the individual [using drugs or being impared, etc]

    so why BLAME or scapegoat bareback gay porn?

    why not get angry at men who are married and in a committed and closed longer term relationship for barebacking?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Feb 18, 2010 10:52 PM GMT
    Your logic and bareback porn itself are both bad because:

    1. The actors in gay videos who bareback are exposing themselves to an HIV risk. Even a gay porn producer like Chi Chi LaRue requires his actors to use condoms, and argues for a mandatory industry policy for their use.

    2. These bareback videos send a message to less sophisticated & poorly informed gay men that barebacking with strangers is OK, when it's not.

    3. Straight vaginal sex is not the same as anal sex. There is much less chance of tissues tearing in the vagina during straight sex versus the rectum and anus during anal, damage which provides the entry point for the HIV virus contained in semen. Even so, an HIV risk to women also exists, and they, too, should require that a stranger use a condom.

    4. Bareback videos provide ammunition for right-wingers who want to totally shut down the gay porn industry. I like gay porn, would like it to continue without interruption.

    Let's not be stupid about this, OK? Barebacking is the main reason why HIV among gay men still isn't under control. Can we demonstrate a little responsibility here?
  • Timbales

    Posts: 13993

    Feb 18, 2010 11:10 PM GMT
    nothing gets me hotter than watching people take stupid, unnecessary risks with their life for little pay
  • Melos

    Posts: 264

    Feb 18, 2010 11:34 PM GMT
    BJBien1010 said

    so why BLAME or scapegoat bareback gay porn?

    It makes for an easy scapegoat. Society can apparently no longer think for its self so whatever we see we do. Hence why Marilyn Manson and Slipknot are the sole cause for Columbine.

    People should never be held for their own decisions, we as humans have the right to find someone or something else out there to take the blame.

    If I buy some coffee, take off the lid, drive and hit a bump, burn my vagina, it is obviously McDonald's that should take the blame!


    Fucking a....
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 11, 2010 7:07 PM GMT
    Having bareback porn is like advertising to the gay community. It certainly put people's mind to have unprotected sex, and it seems more 'dirty', which will turn some people on and go ahead a try it.