Oklahoma tea party leaders, lawmakers eye militia

  • metta

    Posts: 39075

    Apr 13, 2010 7:34 AM GMT
    Oklahoma tea party leaders, lawmakers eye militia

    http://newsok.com/oklahoma-tea-party-leaders-lawmakers-eye-militia/article/3453336?custom_click=headlines_widget
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 13, 2010 2:57 PM GMT
    What do they want to do separate from the union??
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 13, 2010 3:24 PM GMT
    No, they do not want to seperate from the union. My gosh you queers read the article.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 13, 2010 3:25 PM GMT
    You closet cases should read the posts. Nobody said they wanted to, somebody asked.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 13, 2010 3:26 PM GMT
    PAstud21 saidNo, they do not want to seperate from the union. My gosh you queers read the article.

    Why do you always refer to us as "queers" and "fags" in your posts? How do you describe yourself? What are you, exactly?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 13, 2010 3:27 PM GMT
    What the hell is the country coming to that they have to call to arms over this?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 13, 2010 3:27 PM GMT
    Red_Vespa said
    PAstud21 saidNo, they do not want to seperate from the union. My gosh you queers read the article.

    Why do you always refer to us as "queers" and "fags" in your posts? How do you describe yourself? What are you, exactly?


    She thinks it makes her look like a real boy.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 13, 2010 3:28 PM GMT
    PAstud21 saidNo, they do not want to seperate from the union. My gosh you queers read the article.


    that's hardly fair. it sure looks like, by forming a militia, the confederacy of an earlier time.

    The militia's purpose would be to defend against what activists see as improper federal infringements on state sovereignty.


    wtf?

    i have also read elsewhere that the tea party gained steam mostly due to economic woes...once the economy picks back up, most of those folks will return to a more moderate stance. we can only hope it happens sooner rather than later.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 13, 2010 3:33 PM GMT
    McGay said
    Red_Vespa said
    PAstud21 saidNo, they do not want to seperate from the union. My gosh you queers read the article.

    Why do you always refer to us as "queers" and "fags" in your posts? How do you describe yourself? What are you, exactly?

    She thinks it makes her look like a real boy.

    A real boy, or a real fake? Calling us queers & fags in almost every post should make us wonder, and referring to gays as "you" but never "us." It does give the impression we're not dealing with one of our own, would you not agree? Hostile to gays, insulting and ignorant of gay culture. Now what does that suggest to you? Merely a closet case, or something a bit more sinister?
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 13, 2010 3:42 PM GMT
    PAstud21 saidNo, they do not want to seperate from the union. My gosh you queers read the article.


    ...said the emaciated little faggot.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 13, 2010 3:44 PM GMT
    Red_Vespa said
    McGay said
    Red_Vespa said
    PAstud21 saidNo, they do not want to seperate from the union. My gosh you queers read the article.

    Why do you always refer to us as "queers" and "fags" in your posts? How do you describe yourself? What are you, exactly?

    She thinks it makes her look like a real boy.

    A real boy, or a real fake? Calling us queers & fags in almost every post should make us wonder, and referring to gays as "you" but never "us." It does give the impression we're not dealing with one of our own, would you not agree? Hostile to gays, insulting and ignorant of gay culture. Now what does that suggest to you? Merely a closet case, or something a bit more sinister?


    Yes, yes, I get that too. He's likely not even gay and if he is, he's a big ol closet case with a chronic case of scaredy-cat. He'd never refer to anybody here in person as a fag or queer. No pussy ever would.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 15, 2010 5:57 AM GMT
    PAstud21 saidNo, they do not want to seperate from the union. My gosh you queers read the article.


    If you had half a brain you would know what the definition of a militia is. The term militia (pronounced /miːˈli.ti.a/) is commonly used today to refer to a military force composed of ordinary citizens[1] to provide defense, emergency law enforcement, or paramilitary service, in times of emergency without being paid a regular salary or committed to a fixed term of service.

    Now you try reading the article "The militia's purpose would be to defend against what activists see as improper federal infringements on state sovereignty."

    now I know you arent that smart but logically if you are going to have a militia, yes that is right a military force, to protect your state from the federal government you have some intention of separating yourself from said federal government. Attacking your government with a military force if as a protectionist measure would be TREASON which is specifically defined in the United States Constitution, the only crime so defined. Article III Section 3 delineates treason as follows:
    Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

    By raising a military force against the United States Government you would be committing treason. The only reason no confederates were tried for treason was President Jackson pardoned them all as he was leaving office.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 15, 2010 6:17 AM GMT
    Red_Vespa said
    PAstud21 saidNo, they do not want to seperate from the union. My gosh you queers read the article.

    Why do you always refer to us as "queers" and "fags" in your posts? How do you describe yourself? What are you, exactly?


    Why do you refure to yourself as one of us when you spent most of your life with your back turned to us because you seen us as dirty. So now you too are dirty!

    As a pure homosexual I myself have no issues with such words, because thats all they are.

    I am a fag. But to me a fag is a pure homosexual

    No breeders thus no bisexuals like yourself.

    No flamers as we are just regular guys who just also happen to be pure homosexuals unlike yourself, because you are a bisexual.

    You must be born with a penis too!

    There is also a queer section of the gay community and they are mostly left wing! So you can stand under the banner of queer if you like. But not fag as it's for us pure homosexuals. Oh and until the left wing accepts gay republicans as equal, there will always be a divide in the gay community. I did not start it.

    Have a nice day. I would of said "sir" but you are not my Superior.
  • metta

    Posts: 39075

    Apr 16, 2010 2:54 AM GMT



    tea-parties-237-years.gif


    http://www.theatlanticwire.com/features/view/feature/Tea-Parties-What-a-Difference-237-Years-Makes-1062


    Tea-party crashers:

    http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=140889



    boston1.jpg


    boston2.jpg


    boston3.jpg


    boston4.jpg

    boston9.jpg