Tops Vs Bottoms: Physical double standard?

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 26, 2010 8:35 PM GMT
    I read on another message board somewhere that there is pressure for Bottoms to be in shape (thin waist, nice butt, flat stomach, etc) more than there is for Tops.

    Is this true in your opinion? Do you Bottoms find yourself not caring about the Tops body as much as long as he's fulfilling his Top "duties"? Same question for the Tops out there regarding Bottoms...




  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 26, 2010 9:12 PM GMT
    True tops are in short supply.

    Bottoms are a dime a dozen.

    You do the math. icon_smile.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 26, 2010 9:47 PM GMT
    Well, shorter, lean, smaller, nice backside, mmm that makes it freakin hot yes, but then you can pick them up a lot easier and move them.. I've done the same for big muscled guys too, but it's not as easy and lots of them tend to wonder what the hell is going on when you grab'em so hard and flip'em over, it doesn't happen as much for them so they tend to sorta get startled the first few times it happens, but the lil ones are much more used to it!

    So yes, there is a bit of a double standard I suppose, but, then like the previous guy said, when there is such a great disparity in numbers between tops and bottoms then I suppose you relax your standards a little heh.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 27, 2010 3:04 AM GMT
    I think it goes both ways bro...if ur fit nine times outta ten, u will be attracted to wut U r, and vice versa. If someone is adding pressure to their physical pressence, thats on them. Just be wut ur lookin 4icon_lol.gif
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Apr 28, 2010 2:53 AM GMT
    Indy404 saidI read on another message board somewhere that there is pressure for Bottoms to be in shape (thin waist, nice butt, flat stomach, etc) more than there is for Tops.

    Is this true in your opinion? Do you Bottoms find yourself not caring about the Tops body as much as long as he's fulfilling his Top "duties"? Same question for the Tops out there regarding Bottoms...


    While I usually bottom for guys that are at least relatively in decent shape, I noticed that the sexual performance of a top is directly proportional to his fitness level.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 11, 2010 4:33 PM GMT
    It doesn't matter if the bottom is in too decent shape, as long as they have a tight hole and able to switch to different positions.
  • safety43_mma1...

    Posts: 4251

    Jun 17, 2010 5:58 AM GMT
    WHO CARES REALLY. i think to much is put into is the top bigger then bottom. it really shouldnt matter in the end as long as both parties involved r attracted to eachother. when i am in the mood i am not worried about is the top bigger then me or not. and like wise when i top also.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Jun 17, 2010 6:38 AM GMT
    safety43 saidWHO CARES REALLY. i think to much is put into is the top bigger then bottom. it really shouldnt matter in the end as long as both parties involved r attracted to eachother. when i am in the mood i am not worried about is the top bigger then me or not. and like wise when i top also.


    I agree with safety43. If your attracted to each other and your hearts are in it. Who really cares.