Jan 23, 2013 7:44 PM GMT
Blakes7 saidOf course, no one bothers to comment. They think it's absurd for anyone to think Hillary could possibly be incompetent or negligent.
Blakes7 saidThey did nothing before, and nothing but lie about it afterwards. That seems either incompetent, negligent, or both to me.
Blakes7 saidThey - meaning Obama, Hillary, Rice, and whoever else was involved in lying to the press. Normally that annoys the press to no end, I wonder why they overlook it now.......
riddler78 said3 Incredibly Outrageous Evasions by Hillary Clinton About Benghazi
topathlete saidThe_Gingerhead_Man saidBlakes7 saidOf course, no one bothers to comment. They think it's absurd for anyone to think Hillary could possibly be incompetent or negligent.
Probably because no one here said she was either incompetent or negligent. In fact Sen. Paul said he didn't think she was negligent.
What we do have here is Ridder78 doing what he does which is cutting and pasting links with no sign of independent thought and you expecting people to argue against claims that were not made.
Perhaps if you actually make the case for Clinton's incompetence or negligence someone would engage you in a discussion on the topic.
The point made by Rand Paul was very obvious, whether or not you agree with him. It was that Hillary not reading the continual requests for help from an Ambassador in a dangerous area was a dereliction of duty.The_Gingerhead_Man saidriddler78 said3 Incredibly Outrageous Evasions by Hillary Clinton About Benghazi
Two opinion pieces copied and pasted by Riddler!
What was the point of this message other than waste space? Why don't you worry about the continual links that Metta8 posts, or qw..... same thing? You're doing nothing but blowing hot air.
topathlete saidThe_Gingerhead_Man saidI had made the claim earlier that riddler78 simply posts links to things without showing in sort of independent thought. That post simply backed up my claim.
I didn't realize that I had some sort of obligation to worry about each individual member of RJ and what they posting.
I have seen any number of threads where riddler will become actively involved in discussions about the links he posts if there is intelligent discussion that follows in the thread.
If you're going to criticize the forum conduct of one member while remaining silent about the same conduct of others, some very obvious, then you demonstrate another agenda. Why not yourself deal with substantive facts instead of doing a non-substantive play-by-play of riddler's posts?
meninlove said The_Gingerhead_Man, what I do to make their posts make sense is simply imagine the following words prefacing all their posts.
"Look, I have an ideological agenda and I'm desperate, so..(then read post)"
Generally, what I've found is that these guys usually end up in the position of governor Chris Christie, and their day will come.
It's been pointed out in past topics that when the GOP was in power much worse incidents occurred than Benghazi. These guys had zip to say then, which is equivalent to a giant shouting out of their agenda. It's only awful if a Liberal is involved.
If this was the GOP and Hillary was in her position as a Republican, Riddler would never have posted this topic.
riddler78 saidAs someone else pointed out, it's ironic that despite being a feminist icon, Hilary Clinton finds herself in the same position of protecting a powerful man...