Dec 18, 2013 7:19 PM GMT
One advantage of using genetic engineering to help crops adapt to these sudden changes is that new varieties can be created quickly. Creating a potato variety through conventional breeding, for example, takes at least 15 years; producing a genetically modified one takes less than six months. Genetic modification also allows plant breeders to make more precise changes and draw from a far greater variety of genes, gleaned from the plants’ wild relatives or from different types of organisms. Plant scientists are careful to note that no magical gene can be inserted into a crop to make it drought tolerant or to increase its yield—even resistance to a disease typically requires multiple genetic changes. But many of them say genetic engineering is a versatile and essential technique.
“It’s an overwhelmingly logical thing to do,” says Jonathan Jones, a scientist at the Sainsbury Laboratory in the U.K. and one of the world’s leading experts on plant diseases. The upcoming pressures on agricultural production, he says, “[are] real and will affect millions of people in poor countries.” He adds that it would be “perverse to spurn using genetic modification as a tool.”
somersault saidwhat bullshit, I wonder how many GMO patents MIT holds
riddler78 saidsomersault saidwhat bullshit, I wonder how many GMO patents MIT holds
Probably quite a number. What makes it bullshit? Given the choice would you rather GMOs or mass starvation?
somersault saidriddler78 saidsomersault saidwhat bullshit, I wonder how many GMO patents MIT holds
Probably quite a number. What makes it bullshit? Given the choice would you rather GMOs or mass starvation?
MIT just wants to cash in on their patents, there's no need for GMOs and they are harmful. Starvation is caused by overpopulation and corrupt governments.
riddler78 saidsomersault saidriddler78 saidsomersault saidwhat bullshit, I wonder how many GMO patents MIT holds
Probably quite a number. What makes it bullshit? Given the choice would you rather GMOs or mass starvation?
MIT just wants to cash in on their patents, there's no need for GMOs and they are harmful. Starvation is caused by overpopulation and corrupt governments.
Are you also against hybridization?
somersault saidriddler78 saidsomersault saidriddler78 saidsomersault saidwhat bullshit, I wonder how many GMO patents MIT holds
Probably quite a number. What makes it bullshit? Given the choice would you rather GMOs or mass starvation?
MIT just wants to cash in on their patents, there's no need for GMOs and they are harmful. Starvation is caused by overpopulation and corrupt governments.
Are you also against hybridization?
dude that's been around since Mendel, and probably much earlier, so no
somersault saidhybidization takes place naturally through cross-pollination and reproduction also
4sport saidHere's what Wikipedia has to say about GMOs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_organism
While all technologies can be misused, there are huge, real human problems (i.e. mass starvation from climate change/drought) which can be helped by engineering and rigorously testing crops.
somersault, if you have fact based reasons for objecting to all GMOs, please share them.
peterstrong saidstrawberries don't ever mate with fish out in wild nature - GMO is WRONG and BAD and DANGEROUS and UNNEEDED
Its not hybridization at all,
Its corporate greed run wild and DANGEROUS !
We have been fed the same lines of bullshit about how pesticides and herbicides are necessary for growing food for generations - its corporate greed propaganda pure and simple
Mansanto is now spraying agent orange on GMO crops,
with absolutely no concern for the air, ground water, or soil.
That's corporate greed gone wild at the highest levels they have bought off our govt.
In order to keep their share of the 40 billion in tax dollar subsidies flowing to them.
Riddler ORGANIC SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE is the last vestige of free market capitalism.
A level playing field would end the subsidies for junk food and GMO - We also pay for all the $ we give those crony capitalists on the back end with the high cost of obesity - over 300K dead per year because they eat themselves to death with cheap junk food.
http://www.greenerideal.com/politics/0909-un-study-african-pesticide-use-could-lead-to-a-90-billion-in-illness/
meninlove said
As for comparing hybridization to GMO as the same, perhaps Riddler can explain how they crossed a person with a rice plant. The sex must have been rather interesting to see.
Or perhaps they pollinated a human egg?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-440302/The-rice-human-genes.html
Apparition saidso if the point is that "poor people can't afford food" how is "pay monsanto for seeds every year, never being able to reuse your own crop" going to help the poor?
Did monsanto stop licensing seeds?
riddler78 saidLuddites anyone? What makes it worse is that the knee jerk opposition to GMOs is in some cases pure evil and otherwise condemns the poor mostly kids to die.