CALIFORNIA Governor Says It Is Okay to Have Certain Sex Acts with Minors 14 Years or older IF You are less than 10 Yrs Older Than the Minor

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 15, 2020 5:17 AM GMT
    https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-09-11/sb145-sex-crimes-law-gavin-newsom-lgbtq-rights
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 15, 2020 11:12 PM GMT
    ScientificAromaticArabianhorse-size_rest
  • Destinharbor

    Posts: 5263

    Sep 15, 2020 11:23 PM GMT
    You're a moron and that's not what the bill says. Fool.
  • northbeach

    Posts: 1257

    Sep 16, 2020 12:14 AM GMT
    Astrologer's account probably got hijacked by some incel troll. He used to be all about the astrology shit, now he's just another Kluckandpluck or muskelprotz, posting fake news or totally-distorted interpretations of real news.

    What next? lol, make a thread titled "chilly September - global cooling!" then quote an article that says how right-wing nutjobs will FALSELY claim that the unusually chilly September is a sign of global cooling? lmao
  • metta

    Posts: 54483

    Sep 16, 2020 12:59 AM GMT
    The title of this thread is misleading, to say the least. That is not what the bill says. Read the bill.
  • KluckAndPluck

    Posts: 1149

    Sep 16, 2020 1:07 PM GMT
    metta saidThe title of this thread is misleading, to say the least. That is not what the bill says. Read the bill.



    This is pretty funny, coming from a person who constantly posts misleading topic titles and fake stories here.
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 22694

    Sep 20, 2020 2:04 AM GMT
    metta saidThe title of this thread is misleading, to say the least. That is not what the bill says. Read the bill.
    Conservatives are the undisputed experts at distortion and lies so this is no surprise here.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 20, 2020 6:48 AM GMT
    KluckAndPluck said
    metta saidThe title of this thread is misleading, to say the least. That is not what the bill says. Read the bill.



    This is pretty funny, coming from a person who constantly posts misleading topic titles and fake stories here.


    ^ Not only that but most of wtf he posts have a far-left liberal biased leaning... And this is coming from someone who is a 'middle of the road' Independent...
  • jocked_and_lo...

    Posts: 4885

    Sep 20, 2020 8:42 AM GMT
    roadbikeRob said
    metta saidThe title of this thread is misleading, to say the least. That is not what the bill says. Read the bill.
    Conservatives are the undisputed experts at distortion and lies so this is no surprise here.


    Says the blathering idiot who voted for Trump and when his sad life didn't change he became RJ's anti-Trump raging socialist.

    You are no authority on anything AT ALL.
  • wild_sky360

    Posts: 4082

    Sep 20, 2020 5:17 PM GMT
    Ten years is half a lifetime in these proposed cases. But if ten years is the standard for both, I'll admit I'm a little shocked at first, without looking at actual cases where a reasonable person would side with the person being prosecuted. For instance, a dating high school couple .. of either orientation, but with only a two or three year spread. There have already been horrible, malicious prosecutions of honorable young men when they turn 18, for sexual relations within an ongoing relationship with a then *underage* girl of 15/16. High school kids who share dick pics can and have been prosecuted for distributing child porn.. etc. Judges instruct juries to follow the letter of the law and grand juries instruct DA's to prosecute the letter of the law.

    It wouldn't be the first time that something bad in legislation is covered by intent to do something good. It's a deliberate strategy in some instances. And I'm not suggesting that is what is happening here, even though it has a whiff of it. It has a whiff of political as well. If all this does is equalize treatment under the law for gay sexual acts vs. straight sexual acts, I'm for it. But what else does it do, if anything, that isn't already in codified law? I think that is the most important thing to debate or clarify and I do not know it. The ten years aspect is rather icky, but again if it is only equalizing, then I suppose it's a start in the right direction. The age thing can be addressed separately, and later if desired. I personally believe it should, but much more importantly, reviewed equally.

    I wrote and then deleted an opinion the day this thread began, because I didn't have the facts, the contextual arguments, or the acuity to fully digest the bill as written. So far no one has offered up those. Reiterating from above, these things can stare you in the face without revealing their complete intent. If it is unequivocally cut and dry vs much ado about nothing then there isn't much to talk about and it is a legitimate gay issue.
  • ObscureAndFuz...

    Posts: 1512

    Sep 21, 2020 12:15 AM GMT
    venue35 saidThe only time in rj history where I actually received a reply from the metta man himself is when I said something mean about Diana Ross


    I'm convinced most of the time the Metta account is in "auto post mode" and it is only very rarely that a human being will actually post something from the Metta account.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 21, 2020 3:19 AM GMT
    ObscureAndFuzzy said
    venue35 saidThe only time in rj history where I actually received a reply from the metta man himself is when I said something mean about Diana Ross


    I'm convinced most of the time the Metta account is in "auto post mode" and it is only very rarely that a human being will actually post something from the Metta account.


    ^ Are you saying all he does (*assuming he by point of fact is a "real" person) is copy and paste stories? What do you mean when you say that his RJ account is in "auto post mode" Can you expound a little please? Inquiring minds would like to know.. Thanks in advance here icon_wink.gif
  • wild_sky360

    Posts: 4082

    Sep 21, 2020 4:23 AM GMT
    Metta's threads liven this place up. Has anyone noticed the post counts on some of them?
    Gets guys talking.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 21, 2020 2:13 PM GMT
    wild_sky360 said
    Metta's threads liven this place up. Has anyone noticed the post counts on some of them?
    Gets guys talking.

    Metta also posts his own comments, besides providing links. Not all political, lots of interesting general info, much of it scientific. But these bot charges against metta go back many years to southbeach1500, who was obsessed with him.

    I think partly out of jealousy because metta’s posts were often well regarded, while his own were panned for their politically-biased falsehoods. And also ironic, because SB himself would post upwards of a dozen linked articles from different sources, including summaries, within 1 minute!

    Not sure how a human can do that without artificial assistance. Or why he would clutter up the threads like that, a kind of spamming.

    So when I see these current anti-metta posts, the same style & accusations as the old SB posts, I do wonder if that banned troll ever did leave RJ permanently.
  • KluckAndPluck

    Posts: 1149

    Sep 21, 2020 2:29 PM GMT
    Destinharbor saidYou're a moron and that's not what the bill says. Fool.


    It's from the liberal LA Times. So what's wrong about it?

  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 21, 2020 10:04 PM GMT
    jocked_and_loaded said
    roadbikeRob said
    metta saidThe title of this thread is misleading, to say the least. That is not what the bill says. Read the bill.
    Conservatives are the undisputed experts at distortion and lies so this is no surprise here.


    Says the blathering idiot who voted for Trump and when his sad life didn't change he became RJ's anti-Trump raging socialist.

    You are no authority on anything AT ALL.

    Good point, but roadrageBlob (hat tip: jocked_and_loaded) is skilled at filling a room with bowel gas, engaging in psychological projection, burning his college diploma in public, and being a poster boi for Dunning-Kruger Syndrome.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 22, 2020 6:29 AM GMT
    jockjoy said
    jocked_and_loaded said
    roadbikeRob said
    metta saidThe title of this thread is misleading, to say the least. That is not what the bill says. Read the bill.
    Conservatives are the undisputed experts at distortion and lies so this is no surprise here.


    Says the blathering idiot who voted for Trump and when his sad life didn't change he became RJ's anti-Trump raging socialist.

    You are no authority on anything AT ALL.

    Good point, but roadrageBlob (hat tip: jocked_and_loaded) is skilled at filling a room with bowel gas, engaging in psychological projection, burning his college diploma in public, and being a poster boi for Dunning-Kruger Syndrome.



    4ftvli.jpg
  • roadbikeRob

    Posts: 22694

    Sep 22, 2020 12:57 PM GMT
    Brian_RoXXX said
    jockjoy said
    jocked_and_loaded said
    roadbikeRob said
    metta saidThe title of this thread is misleading, to say the least. That is not what the bill says. Read the bill.
    Conservatives are the undisputed experts at distortion and lies so this is no surprise here.


    Says the blathering idiot who voted for Trump and when his sad life didn't change he became RJ's anti-Trump raging socialist.

    You are no authority on anything AT ALL.

    Good point, but roadrageBlob (hat tip: jocked_and_loaded) is skilled at filling a room with bowel gas, engaging in psychological projection, burning his college diploma in public, and being a poster boi for Dunning-Kruger Syndrome.



    4ftvli.jpg
    As usual both the steroid freak and the narrow minded bible thumping screwball are both showing their blatant stupidity and poisoning these forums with their lethal right wing effluent. What else is new around hereicon_razz.gif
  • wild_sky360

    Posts: 4082

    Sep 22, 2020 7:19 PM GMT
    Ok, but who objects to anyone fucking kids?
    I wish I could trust good intentions here but this assembly also wants to rescind civil rights laws. Because those laws don't allow discrimination, which many members are openly in favor of. Yeah. Let us strip your rights and hold them for you.. safekeeping, while we do a little social engineering work. Trust us. We're your friend.

    If you're scratching your head now, you have to consider that
    it makes perfect sense if you're an insane SJW who realizes that they came within inches of complete political control. The country is that oblivious.

    I'd be curious to see how Los Angeles Times presented that story to more accurately judge how they covered this one.
  • Posted by a hidden member.
    Log in to view his profile

    Sep 23, 2020 2:00 AM GMT
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KE73AfVsw8&ab_channel=BeLikeWaterMedia

    TRUMP 2020